Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0011140032140.970-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > 
> > > I am tempted to apply this.  This is the second person who asked for
> > > binding to a single port.  The patch looks quite complete, with doc
> > > changes.  It appears to be a thorough job.
> > 
> > Postmaster options are evil, please put something in backend/utils/guc.c.  
> > (This is not the fault of the patch submitter, since this interface is new
> > for 7.1, but that still doesn't mean we should subvert it.)
> 
> I have put code in guc.c to handle this, but there still are postmaster
> options for it too.

What happened to the concerns that were raised?  The socket file is a lock
file, you cannot just move it around.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: Details for planned template0/template1 change
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support