Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0011031845110.1076-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> OK, we have votes from Lamar, Ned, Jan, and someone else to keep it in
> /contrib, votes from Marc and Tom to remove it completely.
> 
> Other votes?

What part of "no new features in bug-fix releases" is giving people
trouble?

If Great Bridge wants this in their platinum certified re-release, nothing
is stopping them.  If Great Bridge "bugs" people to release ASAP, why
don't they release it themselves?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with 2 avcuums in parallel
Next
From: Partyka Robert
Date:
Subject: postgres not use table access permissions ?