Re: MySQL -> pgsql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: MySQL -> pgsql
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0010252231420.790-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MySQL -> pgsql  (Ron Chmara <ron@Opus1.COM>)
Responses Vexing DBD::Pg problem  (J B Bell <jbbell@intergate.ca>)
List pgsql-general
Ron Chmara writes:

> When we went searching for "large data set" information, we couldn't
> find anybody doing this on postgresql, and decided that we didn't
> want to risk being first. :-)

Several people have had databases of 60 GB or more.

> Oracle, IMNSHO, sucks rocks for most things, but for scalabilty, the
> table-as-file metaphor has real problems once a single table needs
> to hit those insane levels.

When your tables exceed 1 GB, you get more than one file.

--
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Steve Wolfe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.0.2-2 on Red Hat 7.0?
Next
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.0.2-2 on Red Hat 7.0?