Re: Re: Add support for - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: Add support for
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0010241807350.1165-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add support for  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

>   After looking at this I'm confused again.  The configure test
> consists of seeing whether cpp will process
> 
>     #include <netinet/tcp.h>
> 
> without complaint.  I can well believe that the full C compilation
> process will generate errors if <netinet/tcp.h> is included without
> also including <netinet/in.h>, but it's a little harder to believe
> that cpp alone will complain.  Could you double-check this?

I'm not quite sure whether it explains it, but note that preprocessor
checks also "fail" when warnings are generated.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: how to access backend pid from libpq ?
Next
From: "Vadim Mikheev"
Date:
Subject: Re: relation ### modified while in use