Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0010121653520.776-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> My assumption is that we never came up with any solution to this, right?

It stopped when we noticed that proper support for non-finite values will
break indexing, because the relational trichotomy doesn't hold.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Automatic code conversion between UNICODE and other encodings
Next
From: Jeff Hoffmann
Date:
Subject: Re: Where's the PostgreSQL logo these days?