Re: Large objects with JDBC - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Joachim Achtzehnter
Subject Re: Large objects with JDBC
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0008131253590.4724-100000@wizard.kraut.bc.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Large objects with JDBC  (Rob Judd <rjudd@mlug.missouri.edu>)
List pgsql-interfaces
Yesterday, in a message to pgsql-interfaces, Rob Judd wrote:
>
> I would like to save Java objects in the database.  I tried a couple of
> different ways before finding one that worked, and I'd like to know if
> my first attempts failed because the functionality is missing in the
> java classes, or if I did something wrong.  
> 
> Serialize.create(conn, Vector.class) failed - looking in the sources it
> seemed to be missing the code to support arrays.
> 
> PreparedStatement.setBinaryStream(1, InputStream, length) failed with a
> not supported exception.

You can use PreparedStatement.setBytes() as an alternative.

> I did manage to get this working eventually using a different method
> (the large object API) but the other ways seemed much more straight
> forward.

Another disadvantage of the large object API is that it is specific to
Postgresql. This can become an issue if you ever need to port to another
database, e.g. Interbase.

Joachim

--
work:     joachima@realtimeint.com (http://www.realtimeint.com)
private:  joachim@kraut.bc.ca      (http://www.kraut.bc.ca)




pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: george stewart
Date:
Subject: Link for osage.sourceforge.net at pgsql interfaces
Next
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: RE: JDBC2 support