Template matching, a different perspective - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Template matching, a different perspective
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0007130048150.790-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Template matching, a different perspective  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
One thing that occurred to me, if I'm going to rejuggle the templates, why
not name them like the Makefile.${os} and the include/port/${os}.h? We
don't really need two matching logics and no matter how smart we make the
template matching, there's still nothing to be gained if we don't find the
right Makefile.port and include/port/os.h (which we apparently do). So
perhaps get rid of all the fanciness and just use the name detected by the
big case statement at the top of configure.in? (And then treat the subtle
differences *within* the template files.)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel.Janik@linux.cz (Pavel Janík ml.)
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump & blobs - editable dump?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Proposal for aggregate-function cleanups in 7.1