RE: boolean isn't boolean? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject RE: boolean isn't boolean?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0006231929340.484-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: boolean isn't boolean?  (Marc Britten <mbritten@cybernet-usa.com>)
List pgsql-general
Marc Britten writes:

> language-lawyer version.. you used the wrong version of the lang, the docs
> say it complies to SQL3, which has completely different wording than SQL99

SQL3 isn't a standard, the term used to be employed to mean "the potential
successor to ISO/IEC 9075:1992", which turned out to be ISO/IEC 9075:1999,
which is what I quoted.


--
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: boolean isn't boolean?
Next
From: Stephen Lawrence
Date:
Subject: MySQL Command Comparison