Tom Lane writes:
> If you'd prefer not to be concerned about the intermediate conversion
> to abstime, then use the date() notation. The :: notation is designed
> for controlling the type conversion exactly.
Wow, that is definitely confusing. I had always thought that `::' is
"cast, no matter how", and date() is "call the function date, which
happens to do the conversion". But now it seems that the supposed "cast"
syntax is really just a dumb function call whereas the function syntax
actually does more intelligent work behind the scenes.
I have a feeling these type conversion issues aren't going away for a long
time...
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
