Re: Oids vs Serial fields (was Re: [GENERAL] searching oid's) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Oids vs Serial fields (was Re: [GENERAL] searching oid's)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0001152008310.386-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Oids vs Serial fields (was Re: [GENERAL] searching oid's)  (Rick Delaney <rick@consumercontact.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 2000-01-14, Rick Delaney mentioned:

> You make some good points, but where is this recommended in the docs?  I'd like
> to see more of "serial vs oid" if there is something.

Although I don't represent any official opinion, the tendency among the
developers would seem to be not using oids for unique values. The serial
type is guaranteed to be supported for this but oids just happen to work.


--
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Marc Tardif
Date:
Subject: attribute level rules not supported?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [GENERAL] case-insensitive like operator