On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Jules Bean wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, that's word-based? It's just splitting
> on whitespace and punctuation? Unfortunately, that's not quite what
> we need --- our wildcard searches needn't have their '%' on word
> boundaries.
You can have it search on less than word boundaries. It uses a regexp in
the query statement, and actually will match against sub-strings. Check
the documentation. It talks about how this works.
Brett W. McCoy
http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If everything is coming your way then you're in the wrong lane.
