Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karel Zak - Zakkr
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.991227123408.6398C-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL  (Howie <caffeine@toodarkpark.org>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Howie wrote:

> On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > My big question is, what new challenges will we face as
> > > > we become more popular?
> > >
> > > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility.
> >
> > I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible.  We are
> > working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins.
> > Anything else?
>
> tablespace support ( which isnt a trivial task ), groups ( pgsql has this
> sort of functionality already, but i dont think its to the extent that
> Oracle does ), some additional grants ( 'grant connect to' ), 'alter table
> <table> add constraint <constraint definition>'...
>
> tablespace support would put pgsql soooo far ahead of most other rdbmses.


 Yes. A tablespace is good feature for robus SQL engine. And (IMHO):

    - raw i/o device storage manager
    - replication
    - privilege for columns, lock
    - better speed, speed ... and speed :-)
    - on-the-fly backup (from any logs)

                        Karel



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Karel Zak - Zakkr
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Next
From: Adriaan Joubert
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL