Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Jose' Soares Da Silva
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.980612173439.3762B-100000@proxy
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs  (Byron Nikolaidis <byronn@insightdist.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Byron Nikolaidis wrote:

>
>
> Jose' Soares Da Silva wrote:
>
> > Ok Byron, I think this is a good solution.
> > In this way we don't need to add a TIMESTAMP to every table there's already a
> > XMIN present.
> > In any way, what's happen with TIMESTAMPs ? May we have Access recognize it as
> > DATETIME or we can't because Access beleaves that's a ROWVER ?
> > I would like to try it. Please Byron may you send me the code for '=' operator
> > for xid type.
> >                                                          Jose'
>
>
> I added the postgres timestamp type and mapped it to SQL_TIMESTAMP, so Access recognizes it
Good.
> now as a Date/Time.  It does not automatically recognize it is a ROWVER.  Did you read
> somewhere that it did that?  In my testing it never did, UNLESS, I mentioned the column in
> SQLSpecialColumns and specifically said it was a ROWVER.
I beleave we don't need that Access recognize timestamp as a ROWVER, now that
we have an xmin that do this.
                                               Thanks, Jose'


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: "Jose' Soares Da Silva"
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Next
From: Byron Nikolaidis
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs