Re: crypt and MD5 - still not wanted - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak
Subject Re: crypt and MD5 - still not wanted
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.1000708101724.4749A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: crypt and MD5 - still not wanted  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: crypt and MD5 - still not wanted  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> If I recall the prior discussion, MD5 is OK, crypt is still risky,
> because MD5 is not an encryption algorithm so it doesn't fall under
> the US export laws.
> 
> I believe Vince V. is working on improving the password challenge
> code to use MD5, btw.
Not only passwords, but standard SQL functions a my drean is aggregate
function md5count() too. Cool --- that is  MD5 OK.

            Karel



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Oliver Elphick"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] lztext and compression ratios...
Next
From: "Peter Mount"
Date:
Subject: Re: Contacting me