Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak
Subject Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.1000707091909.22065C-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal)  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Responses Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal)  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
> P.S. I have only half-written the lo dumping code, so this is all quite
> open...
A "blasphemy" question, is really needful LO dump if we will have TOAST and
LO will lonely past? If anyone still need dump LO (for example I) is possible 
use pg_dumplo from contrib tree, that (as some users say) works very well. 
Not is work on LO dump, after several years and during LO funeral loss of
time? (sorry).
                    Karel



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: build system
Next
From: Pavel.Janik@linux.cz (Pavel Janík ml.)
Date:
Subject: Re: current CVS: undefined reference to `PGLZ_RAW_SIZE'