> Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:
> >> IIRC, some people were concerned about the fact that freeObject()
> >> couldn't possibly cope with circular structures, multiply-linked
> >> subexpressions, etc. I don't think that's a problem for my intended
> >> use in the relcache --- the only structures I'll be freeing are ones
> >> previously read in by the node-reading functions, and those aren't
> >> going to have any surprises like that.
>
> > IMHO use separate memory context will better and more fast way than
> > freeObject().
>
> A separate memory context for each relcache entry? I don't think so...
No. I mean _common_ for manipulation with query/plan tree.
