Re: [GENERAL] Use of datepart() on TimeStamp. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karel Zak - Zakkr
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Use of datepart() on TimeStamp.
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.1000201143134.23583A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Use of datepart() on TimeStamp.  (Jose Soares <jose@sferacarta.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Jose Soares wrote:

> I suppose do you refer to PostgreSQL date_part() function, while datepart() is a
> M$Access function.


Sorry, next time I read it better...

Hmm, datepart/date_part, it is very simular - IMHO any Micro$oft surely copy
this function from the best SQL - from PostgreSQL :-)

                            Karel


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jose Soares
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Use of datepart() on TimeStamp.
Next
From: Arnaud FLORENT
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL]