Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Terry Mackintosh
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.95.981025102855.31995B-100000@terry1.acun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Last call?  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom and all

I did not know what the '_' and 'x' meant the first time, as I recall the
one for 'Linux ix86' had an '_', or unknown, I can do this for you, should
I grab the Bata2 or the latest snapshot?

On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > Change:
> >         > _  BSDi
> > to
> >         > _  BSDI 3.x and 4.0
> 
> The underscores meant that I don't know if the platform has been
> regression tested yet. Exes meant I did. I was assuming that you had
> already done BSDI (isn't that you're development platform?) and was
> hoping to get a report from you saying to put an "x" for that one.
> 
> So the only platforms I've marked as being confirmed are NT, Unixware,
> SVR4, mklinux, and linux. But I know there are others which are already
> working, I'm just not certain exactly which ones...
> 
>                       - Tom
> 

Terry Mackintosh <terry@terrym.com>          http://www.terrym.com
sysadmin/owner  Please! No MIME encoded or HTML mail, unless needed.

Proudly powered by R H Linux 4.2, Apache 1.3, PHP 3, PostgreSQL 6.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Success Is A Choice ... book by Rick Patino, get it, read it!



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Last call?
Next
From: "Oliver Elphick"
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Last call?