> I didn't see your schema, but couldn't these problems be solved by storing
> the article id, owner id, and blog date in a separate table? It seems that
> if you don't actually need the content of the blogs, all of those questions
> could be answered by querying a very simple table with minimal I/O overhead.
Yes. I was suggesting this as an option but I'm wondering if there
are other solutions.
|\__/|
( oo ) Kari Lavikka - tuner@bdb.fi - (050) 380 3808
__ooO( )Ooo_______ _____ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
""
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Dan Harris wrote:
> Kari Lavikka wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Some background info.. We have a blog table that contains about eight
>> million blog entries. Average length of an entry is 1200 letters. Because
>> each 8k page can accommodate only a few entries, every query that involves
>> several entries causes several random seeks to disk. We are having
>> problems with queries like:
>>
>> 1) give me a list of months when I have written someting
>> 2) give me id's of entries I have written on month X year X
>> 3) give me the number of blog entries my friends have written since last
>> time
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
