Re: two memory-consuming postgres processes - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: two memory-consuming postgres processes
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0805021619380.18755@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to two memory-consuming postgres processes  (Alexy Khrabrov <deliverable@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: two memory-consuming postgres processes  (Alexy Khrabrov <deliverable@gmail.com>)
Re: two memory-consuming postgres processes  (Alexy Khrabrov <deliverable@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Alexy Khrabrov wrote:

> I have an UPDATE query updating a 100 million row table, and
> allocate enough memory via shared_buffers=1500MB.

In addition to reducing that as you've been advised, you'll probably need
to increase checkpoint_segments significantly from the default (3) in
order to get good performance on an update that large.  Something like 30
would be a reasonable starting point.

I'd suggest doing those two things, seeing how things go, and reporting
back if you still think performance is unacceptable.  We'd need to know
your PostgreSQL version in order to really target future suggestions.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: two memory-consuming postgres processes
Next
From: Alexy Khrabrov
Date:
Subject: Re: two memory-consuming postgres processes