Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0802230114480.21179@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Tom Lane wrote:

> Counts are useless here, we need to see the sequence of write locations 
> to find out if there's a lot of nonconsecutive writes happening.

How were you planning to analyze the strace output to quantify that?  I 
would think you'd need to parse the file to grab those locations then 
generate statistics about seeking from them.  Those strace files will be 
huge and I'd expect Joshua would need to do something like that on his 
side before the results will be short enough to share.

> it's quite possible that there's some interaction between the bgwriter 
> and the backend doing COPY

It might be worthwhile to turn off the background writer for these runs, 
both to see if it changes anything and to simplify the output.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Improved (De)Serialization Support
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison