On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> That seems to be a very extreme ratio. Most databases do *many*
> times more reads than writes.
Yes, but the OS has a lot more memory to cache the reads for you, so you
should be relying more heavily on it in cases like this where the card has
a relatively small amount of memory. The main benefit for having a
caching controller is fsync acceleration, the reads should pass right
through the controller's cache and then stay in system RAM afterwards if
they're needed again.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
