Re: SCSI vs SATA - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0704060205580.15433@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SCSI vs SATA  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SCSI vs SATA  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in
> the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large
> fraction of infant mortality.

I've read that much of the damage that causes hard drive infant mortality
is related to shipping.  The drive is fine when it leaves the factory,
gets shaken up and otherwise brutalized by environmental changes in
transit (it's a long trip from Singapore to here), and therefore is a bit
whacked by the time it is installed.  A quick post-installation burn-in
helps ferret out when this happens.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2?