Kris,
do you actually have only 508 disctinct words ? Could you try
more complex queries, say 2-3 words. Does these queries run faster ?
Oleg
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Kris Kiger wrote:
> Regardless of caching, the queries are still taking 19~20 seconds to run
> on the 3,000,000 rows. I've played with performance tuning and nothing
> seems to make much of a difference. If I am reading that list from stat
> correctly, then I am operating on 508 distinct words. Is this the
> performance I should expect from tsearch2? Or is something still awry?
> I'm inclined to think something else is wrong, after reading some
> other people's tsearch performance stats. Thanks!
>
> Kris
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
