Re: [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|ALL) (...) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|ALL) (...)
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.58.0403261659190.12605@elvis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|ALL) (...)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
> Possibly.  The case that I thought was a real bad idea was actually the
> one in def_arg --- we don't want that doing any behind-the-scenes
> translation of words to other things.  The ORDER BY case is just silly.

Ok. So the current code is silly, but the patch must be sound;-)

> > Or the rule factorization must be changed. It can also be done.
>
> Yes.  I think we must have an all_subselect_ops or similar.

I'll do that and resubmit later.

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: jseymour@LinxNet.com (Jim Seymour)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)