Re: GIST question - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re: GIST question
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.33.0105151813000.15894-100000@ra.sai.msu.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GIST question  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> Do you have any idea why you used the column in the GIST code?  That
> code never gets run because the value is never set.
>

We have no idea. This piece of code was written before us.

    Oleg

> > Bruce,
> >
> > we dont' see any problem with removing this field (haskeytype)
> > but it would be **very desirable** first to run regression test
> > (make installcheck) in contrib/intarray after patch applying.
> >
> >     Regards,
> >
> >         Oleg
> > On Tue, 15 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > This GIST question appeared on hackers today.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >     Regards,
> >         Oleg
> > _____________________________________________________________
> > Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
> > Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
> > Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> > phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
> >
> >
> >
>
>

    Regards,
        Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bill McGonigle
Date:
Subject: NAMEDATALEN configuration option patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()