On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Jay Howard wrote:
> Turns out I was returning an array of composites after all. Everything
> works as expected when the array elements are simple types.
>
> That begs the question, though- is supporting arrays of composite types on
> the list of "things to do"?
Sure. The problem here is our poor support of user defined types, not
specifically arrays of composite types.
Kris Jurka
