Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Kris Jurka
Subject Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.64.0801290006040.1881@leary.csoft.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
List pgsql-patches

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jeff Davis wrote:

> I think that pg_dump is a reasonable use case for synchoronized scans
> when the table has not been clustered. It could potentially make pg_dump
> have much less of a performance impact when run against an active
> system.
>

One of the advantages I see with maintaining table dump order is that
rsyncing backups to remote locations will work better.

Kris Jurka


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable