On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have no strong opinion about how matches are returned. Seeing the
> definitional difficulties that you point out, it may be fine to return
> them unordered. But then all "matches" functions should do that.
>
> For the "split" functions, however, providing the order is clearly
> important.
Does this version sufficiently address your concerns?
--
Finagle's Creed:
Science is true. Don't be misled by facts.
