Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeremy Drake
Subject Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.64.0702071231570.28908@resin.csoft.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com> writes:
> > * Put together a patch to add these functions to core.  I could put them
> >   directly in regexp.c, so the support functions could stay static.  My
> >   concern here is that I don't know if there are any functions currently
> >   in core with OUT parameters.
>
> As of 8.2 there are.

Could you give me the name of one in pg_proc.h so I can see how I should
go about adding one there?

> If we are going to include these I would vote for core not contrib
> status, exactly to avoid having to export those functions.

OK, this patch will be my next project.


-- 
History is curious stuffYou'd think by now we had enough
Yet the fact remains I fearThey make more of it every year.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Status of autovacuum and the sporadic stats failures ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] writing new regexp functions