Re: [HACKERS] less privileged pl install - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Jeremy Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] less privileged pl install
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.64.0701262239230.23712@resin.csoft.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] less privileged pl install  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] less privileged pl install  (Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com>)
List pgsql-patches
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> I'd go with GetUserId() in the cases where you're not explicitly
> assigning ownership to the datdba role.  AFAIR the assumption that
> languages are owned by BOOTSTRAP_SUPERUSERID was just a kluge to use in
> some bits of code that had to have a notion of a specific owner.  Now
> in reality every superuser has the same privileges as every other one,
> and so it doesn't matter much which one you use, but we might as well
> record who actually did the deed.

Here is a version of the patch which does this.  Very minor change from
the last version...

--
Begathon, n.:
    A multi-day event on public television, used to raise money so
you won't have to watch commercials.

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] less privileged pl install
Next
From: Jeremy Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] less privileged pl install