Re: PL/Perl compilation error - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alex Pilosov
Subject Re: PL/Perl compilation error
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.10.10010171106190.22422-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/Perl compilation error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PL/Perl compilation error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Gilles DAROLD <gilles@darold.net> writes:
> >> The problem is this will break on older copies of Perl.
>
> > This problem is solved by perl itself !
>
> Yeah, it is: there is a module called Devel::PPPort that isolates
> user C code from the incompatibilities of different Perl APIs.  Until
> someone gets around to submitting a proper fix using PPPort, we'll stick
> with the POLLUTE=1 solution we have now.  I see no reason to install an
> incomplete solution that will fail on older Perls --- we are not in the
> business of forcing people to update their Perls.
I believe that POLLUTE should be a default. People who are using perl5.004
are definitely a minority now. 5.004 is 3 years old now...

-alex


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Adam Lang"
Date:
Subject: Re: off topic
Next
From: oberpwd@anubis.network.com (Wade D. Oberpriller)
Date:
Subject: PL/PGSQL documentation