Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brett W. McCoy
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSI.3.91.980722145257.7328H-100000@access1.lan2wan.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> University Ingres was first, then commercial Ingres was a split-off.
> PostgreSQL is based on University Ingres.

That's what I thought...

Brett W. McCoy
                                         http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected."
   -- The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June, 1972


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products