Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.44.0301130939520.39187-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (greg@turnstep.com)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  ("Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 greg@turnstep.com wrote:

> > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
>
> Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for?

Any given day.  It's disk space, not traffic.

> > On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the bandwidth, it's less than the normal
> > traffic for Pop4 (an ISP) and the streaming audio uses up even more than
> > that.
>
> Sounds like the mirrors could easily absorb more of the traffic from the
> main page, especially once we get an easier mirroring system in place.

The mirrors now consist of the Users Lounge - links, docs and mailing list
info.  If it shrinks much more there won't be any reason to mirror.

Vince.
-- Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond!  http://www.pop4.net/  http://www.meanstreamradio.com
http://www.unknown-artists.com       Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: greg@turnstep.com
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Next
From: "Dan Langille"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?