On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > OK, no one complained/commented on my idea of having global users have a
> > > trailing '@', so here is a patch that implements that. It has the
> > > advantages of:
> >
> > Probably because not everyone saw it. I know I didn't. This entire
> > issue is growing more and more complex. How about a configure item
> > to not even compile it in? Or better yet, a configure item to put
> > it there with the default off.
>
> I think I am prety close, and I don't see a configure flag as any better
> than a GUC option that is off by default.
But how many people would even use it? I can't see adding the bloat
unnecessarily and risking it accidently being turned on. Am I wrong
and really alot of people actually want/need this?
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com http://www.meanstreamradio.com
http://www.unknown-artists.com
==========================================================================
