On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > How about if we just document that they have to create a
> > > postgres@template1 user before flipping the switch. That way, there is
> > > no special user, no PG_INSTALLER file, and no double-tests for user
> > > names.
> >
> > ... and no useful superuser account; if you can't connect to anything
> > except template1 then you ain't much of a superuser.
> >
> > To get around that you'd have to create postgres@db1, postgres@db2,
> > postgres@db3, etc etc. This would be a huge pain in the neck; I think
> > it'd render the scheme impractical. (Keep in mind that anybody who'd be
> > interested in this feature at all has probably got quite a number of
> > databases to contend with.)
>
> Yes, I hear you, but that brings us around full-circle to the original
> patch with one super-user who is the install user.
>
> I don't know where else to go with the patch at this point. I think
> increasing the number of 'global' users is polluting the namespace too
> much, and having none seems to be unappealing. This is why I am back to
> just the install user.
I wouldn't be in favor of that.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com http://www.meanstreamradio.com
http://www.unknown-artists.com
==========================================================================
