Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl - Mailing list pgsql-patches

On Mon, 14 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Why did you remove indisclustered?
> >
> > Useless it may be, but gratuitously breaking at least two extant clients
> > doesn't seem like a good idea ...
>
> I realize what you are saying now.  Older versions of ODBC still
> reference indisclustered, even though it was bogus.  I will put the
> column into pg_index and mark it to be removed at some future date.

why is it being removed again? I think I missed that discussion, sorry ;(