Re: Re: Call for platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.33.0103221103320.41105-100000@mobile.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for platforms  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: Re: Call for platforms  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
How much 'diviation' are we allowing for?

Solaris x86/7 results, for example, in geometry.out, show a difference of:

1.53102359078377e-11,3 (expected)
1.53102359017709e-11,3 (results)

or

3,-3.06204718156754e-11 (expected)
3,-3.06204718035418e-11 (results)

acceptable diviation?

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > Solaris x86        7.0 2000-04-12, Marc Fournier
> >
> > scrappy, do you still have this machine?
>
> Doing tests on Solaris x86/7 right now, will report as soon as they are
> done ...
>
> > Solaris 2.5.1-2.7 Sparc 7.0 2000-04-12, Peter Eisentraut
> >
> > I'll bet that someone already has Solaris covered. Report?
>
> Will do up Sparc/7 also this morning ...
>
> > AIX 4.3.3 RS6000   7.1 2001-03-21, Gilles Darold
> > BeOS 5.0.3 x86     7.1 2000-12-18, Cyril Velter
> > BSDI 4.01  x86     7.1 2001-03-19, Bruce Momjian
> > Compaq Tru64 5.0 Alpha 7.0 2000-04-11, Andrew McMurry
> > FreeBSD 4.2 x86    7.1 2001-03-19, Vince Vielhaber
>
> FreeBSD 4.3-BETA is good to go also ...
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marek PUBLICEWICZ
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Strange results of CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent run?