Re: A patch for xlog.c - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: A patch for xlog.c
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.33.0102251606060.32140-100000@mobile.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A patch for xlog.c  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: A patch for xlog.c  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Matthew Kirkwood <matthew@hairy.beasts.org> writes:
> > >> Diffs posted to pgsql-patches are generally considered to be requests
> > >> for application of a patch.  If this is only an experiment it had best
> > >> be clearly labeled as such.
> >
> > > OK.  Is there are better place for discussion of such?
> >
> > pgsql-hackers is the place to discuss anything that's experimental or
> > otherwise concerned with future development.
> >
> > > [ possible merits of mmap ]
> >
> > Let's take up that discussion in pghackers.
>
> I always felt the real benefit of mmap() would be to remove use of SysV
> shared memory and use anon mmap() to prevent problems with SysV share
> memory limits.

You'll still have memory limits to overcome ... per user memory limits
being one ... there is no such thing as a 'cure-all' ...



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: A patch for xlog.c
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: A patch for xlog.c