On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I am waiting for someone to comment on this. Anyone?
>
> Seems like we need a policy decision: do we want to try to be ODBC v2 or
> v3? I don't know what else we might have to change if we want to be
> v3-compliant, so that seems like a risky way to proceed right before
> a release ...
Are we breaking anything by losing the v3-compliancy at this point? The
patch is small, so should be brain-dead to reverse at a later date *if* we
aren't breaking anything by applying it now ...
