What version are you using? (dbPG95GetIndex?)
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, David M. Richter wrote:
> Hallo !
>
> I want to tune a database. There a many redundant datas in the database
> , because of all the relations were consider as n:m relations. But the
> most of them are 1:n Relations. So my approach was to cut the
> redundancies to get more performance. But .. happens!
>
> The query with the 3 tables is faster than the query with 2 tables.
>
> That is paradox to the Explain output.
> And: the real database functions like dbPG95GetIndex and all functions
> defined by me are slower.
