Re: [INTERFACES] Re: more odbc patches - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Max Khon
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Re: more odbc patches
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0101240003230.28355-100000@iclub.nsu.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Re: more odbc patches  (Cedar Cox <cedarc@visionforisrael.com>)
List pgsql-odbc
hi, there!

On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Cedar Cox wrote:

> I don't get it.  Does this mean the ODBC driver is checking referential
> integrity before it passes things to the backend server?  Seems kind of
> pointless to me.  I thought the ODBC driver just passes through RI errors
> generated by the backend.

we talk about SQLForeignKeys functionality :)
it has nothing to do with RI errors reporting

> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Max Khon wrote:
>
> > hi, there!
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone comment on this?
> >
> > I have got more comments from Constantin: current implementation will fail
> > (return too many rows) if one table has two foreign keys, e.g.:
> > CREATE TABLE prim(i integer PRIMARY KEY);
> > CREATE TABLE f(i integer REFERENCES prim, j integer REFERENCES prim);

/fjoe


pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch