On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > > dep depend:
> > > $(CC) -MM $(CFLAGS) *.c >depend
> >
> > Why? Shouldn't CFLAGS include CPPFLAGS? These targets seem correct
> > to me as they stand ... other than assuming CC is gcc, but nevermind
> > that...
>
> Just a sanity check: Does anyone use `make depend'? Does everyone know
> about the better way to track dependencies? Does every-/anyone know why
> `make depend' is worse? I just don't want to bother fixing something
> that's dead anyway...
Ummmm ... I don't *hangs head* The only place I've ever really seen it
used extensively is the FreeBSD OS/kernel builds ...
