On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Philip Warner writes:
>
> > >I like the pg_{import,export} names myself ... *nod*
> >
> > Sounds fine also; but we have compatibility issues in that we still need
> > pg_dump. Maybe just a symbolic link to pg_export.
>
> I'm not so fond of changing a long-established program name for the sake
> of ethymological correctness or consistency with other products (yeah,
> right). I got plenty of suggestions if you want to start that. I say
> stick to pg_dump[all], and name the inverse pg_undump, pg_load, or
> pmud_gp.
pmud_gp? *raised eyebrow*