On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> Marc -
> If you're going to consider a point release, should we try to collect
> up any other small patches that would go cleanly into the 7.0 tree?
> Just for instance, the revised view rule name truncation patch I
> posted to PATCHES that no one has commented on, yeah or neah. I don't
> think there are very many of these: it seems to me that most small
> fixes that could be patched to both trees, have been, but I haven't
> been trying to keep an accurate count. (Hmm, Bruce's has been quiet
> this week. Is he on vacation?)
Unless its considered critical to the stable running of the server, like
the patch Tom just committed is, it won't go in ... I'm planning on
running this patch through the weekend and watching things, if all goes
well by Mon/Tues, I'll put out v7.0.3 ... since the above named patch
isn't even in the -CURRENT tree yet, I'm leary of slapping it into
something we consider to be stable, no? :)
> > Ross
>
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 12:06:38AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> I have committed a fix into REL7_0 branch. Although it seems to work,
> > > >> I don't trust it really far because it depends on heap_markpos() and
> > > >> heap_restrpos(), which haven't been used in a long time and are full
> > > >> of alarmed-sounding comments.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the backpatch ...:)
> >
> >
>
> --
> Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu>
> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
> Computer and Information Technology Institute
> Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
