Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0008200005320.3758-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Don Baccus wrote:

> >o how to filter or qualify bug reports so that developers don't spend
> >time having to do that.
> 
> Developers don't have to filter or qualify bug reports e-mailed to the
> bugs list today?  Who's doing it, then, and why can't they continue
> doing so if another tool is used to manage bug reports?

the problem as I see it with any bug tracking tool is someone has to close
off those bugs when fixed ... right now, someone commits a bug fix, and
then fires off an email to the list stating its fixed ... with a bug
tracking system, then they have to go one more step, open up a web
browser, login to the system, find the bug report and close it ...




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's
Next
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's