Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.9911240123270.63896-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?  (marten@feki.toppoint.de)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?  (marten@feki.toppoint.de)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 marten@feki.toppoint.de wrote:

>  a) Due to the database layouts we are in need of doing all these nice
>     sql-statements like "group by" and "having" ... and as posted earlier
>     in this group: they're limited in PostgreSQL.

Since I use 'Group By' quite a bit...Having not so much...can you be more
specific on the problems?

>  b) We had problems with vacuumdb here and there. Some times it cored.
>     We've deleted a 300 MB database under psql and the backend cored ...

What version of PostgreSQL?

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lincoln Yeoh
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] logging stuff in the right sequence.
Next
From: Adriaan Joubert
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions