Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.9911222133270.14653-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?  ("K.Tao" <khtao@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, K.Tao wrote:

> Well I do apologize as all my experiences are in the use of pre 6.5
> versions...I assume there have no longer been any reports of databases
> having to be rebuilt or restored from tape from the way you are talking ;)
>
> Although I still feel that the level of expertise for an admin on a
> Unix platform running PostgreSQL is much higher than lets say Oracle
> on NT.  One example is if you cancel out of a admin process like
> vacuum while in pgsql. U have to have enough exp to know what files to
> go and delete to be able to get pgsql back up and running.

Actually, I believe the pg_vlock file is planned for removal in v7.0 ...
just checked the current source tree, and this hasn't happened yet, but
there was talk on -hackers about removing it since MVCC invalidates the
requirement of locking all tables in a database while doing the vacuum...

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: sciman-devd@21cn.com
Date:
Subject: performance
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?