Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison - Mailing list pgsql-general

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.9910062340250.17532-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison  (Michael Widenius <monty@monty.pp.sci.fi>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Michael Widenius wrote:

> As you may have seen on the postgreSQL list, crash-me was actually
> right that postgreSQL didn't support -- comments and HAVING as
> required by ANSI SQL.  Isn't it nice that we help you fix your bugs?

Actually, I believe Thomas did research on this point (or was it Tom?) and
determined that HAVING w/o aggregates is *not* required by ANSI SQL ...
could out point out where this requirement is listed? *raised eyebrow*

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Dryden
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison