Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] Re: SSL patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] Re: SSL patch
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.05.9907241403560.55528-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] Re: SSL patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] Re: SSL patch
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:

> > Just to clearify: the SSL-enabled server still accepts 6.6 clients that are
> > compiled without SSL support, but it will not accept from 6.5 clients, as it
> > is now. 
> 
> Right.  My feeling is that we must make it possible for a 6.6 server to
> accept connections from 6.5 (and earlier) clients, or the upgrade will
> be too painful at large sites.

But, we've had protocol changes before that breaks backward
compatibility...why is this all of a sudden a problem?  As long as this is
a "known" issue for an upgrade (something for the 'migrating to...'
section of the HISTORY file), I personally see no reason why the protocol
can't mature/change...

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] inserts/updates problem under stressing !
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SSL patch